The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)

Name: The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)
Price: 39.95 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.7 (9 reviews)

4.7 of 5 Stars: Legal History - The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)

$39.95

Buying Options

Description

Book Synopsis: The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, sought to protect the rights of the newly freed slaves; but its first important test did not arise until five years later. When it did, it centered on a vitriolic dispute among the white butchers of mid-Reconstruction New Orleans. The rough-and-tumble world of nineteenth-century New Orleans was a sanitation nightmare, with the city's many slaughterhouses dumping animal remains into neighboring backwaters. When Louisiana finally authorized a monopoly slaughterhouse to bring about sanitation reform, many butchers felt disenfranchised from their livelihoods. Framing their case as an infringement of fundamental rights protected by the new amendment, they flooded the lower courts with nearly 300 suits. The surviving cases that reached the U.S. Supreme Court pitted the butchers' right-to-labor against the state's "police power" to regulate public health. The result was a controversial and long-debated decision that for the first time addressed the meaning and import of the Fourteenth Amendment. Speaking for the slim majority in the Court's 5-4 decision, Justice Samuel F. Miller upheld the state's actions as a fair use of its "police power." Of much greater import, however, was Miller's finding that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended exclusively as a means of protecting and redressing the suffering of former slaves. The result was a very restricted interpretation of the "privileges and immunities," "due process," and "equal protection" clauses of the new amendment. Accustomed to a very limited federal presence in the states, the Court refused to allow the broad terms of a single amendment to alter the existing balance of power between the states and the federal government. In striking contrast, the minority, represented most notably by Justice Stephen Field, claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment had been intended to apply to all Americans, not just former slaves. In particular, the minority contended, it guaranteed the New Orleans butchers a right to equal treatment in the exercise of the police power. The position of the dissenters foreshadowed an aggressive use of the Court's power in the protection of fundamental rights in the future. In The Slaughterhouse Cases, Labb and Lurie take a much needed look at a landmark decision that has been far more cited than closely studied. Engagingly written and insightfully argued, the book provides the most complete analysis yet of this controversial Supreme Court decision, fills a major gap in American history, law, and politics, and sets the standard for all future discussions on the subject.

Details

Looking for a thought-provoking and insightful read? Look no further than "The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment" - a must-have for history buffs, legal enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the complexities of American society. Delve into the fascinating story of a landmark Supreme Court decision that shaped the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, protecting the rights of newly freed slaves.

Step back in time to mid-Reconstruction New Orleans, a city grappling with sanitation nightmares caused by indiscriminate dumping of animal remains. Explore the fierce dispute between white butchers and the state over the establishment of a monopoly slaughterhouse. Nearly 300 lawsuits flooded the lower courts, challenging the constitutionality of the state's actions and invoking the power of the Fourteenth Amendment. This gripping account captures the tension and drama that unfolded as these fundamental rights clashed with the state's obligation to regulate public health.

Join Justice Samuel F. Miller as he delivers a controversial and long-debated decision in favor of the state's "police power." Discover Miller's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment as primarily concerned with protecting the rights of former slaves. Gain insights into the restricted understanding of "privileges and immunities," "due process," and "equal protection" clauses that shaped the Court's ruling. This thought-provoking analysis challenges conventional wisdom and sheds light on the delicate balance of power between states and the federal government.

The minority's dissent, represented by Justice Stephen Field, presents a different view - one that champions a broader interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Explore their argument that the amendment applies to all Americans and guarantees equal treatment under the exercising of police power. Discover how this dissent foreshadowed the Court's future role in safeguarding fundamental rights.

"The Slaughterhouse Cases" is an engagingly written and meticulously researched book that unravels the complexities of this landmark decision. Authored by Labb and Lurie, experts in American history, law, and politics, this comprehensive analysis fills a major gap in scholarship. Whether you're a student, a legal professional, or simply curious about the foundations of American society, this book is a valuable addition to your collection.

Embrace the unique opportunity to delve into this critical chapter of American history. Enhance your knowledge and understanding with "The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment." Click here to grab your copy now and become part of the conversation.

See All Buying Options...

More Details...