Description
Book Synopsis: An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation. Just recently, the Supreme Court rejected an argument by plaintiffs that police officers should no longer be protected by the doctrine of "qualified immunity" when they shoot or brutalize an innocent civilian. "Qualified immunity" is but one of several judicial inventions that shields state violence and thwarts the vindication of our rights. But aren't courts supposed to be protectors of individual rights? As Aziz Huq shows in The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies, history reveals a much more tangled relationship between the Constitution's system of independent courts and the protection of constitutional rights. While doctrines such as "qualified immunity" may seem abstract, their real-world harms are anything but. A highway patrol officer stops a person's car in violation of the Fourth Amendment, violently yanked the person out and threw him to the ground, causing brain damage. A municipal agency fires a person for testifying in a legal proceeding involving her boss's family-and then laughed in her face when she demanded her job back. In all these cases, state defendants walked away with the most minor of penalties (if any at all). Ultimately, we may have rights when challenging the state, but no remedies. In fact, federal courts have long been fickle and unreliable guardians of individual rights. To be sure, through the mid-twentieth century, the courts positioned themselves as the ultimate protector of citizens suffering the state's infringement of their rights. But they have more recently abandoned, and even aggressively repudiated, a role as the protector of individual rights in the faceof abuses by the state. Ironically, this collapse highlights the position that the Framers took when setting up federal courts in the first place.A powerful historical account of the how the expansion of the immunity principle generated yawning gap between rights and remedies in contemporary America, The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies will reshape our understanding of why it has become so difficult to effectively challenge crimes committed by the state.
Details
In today's society, where the protection of our individual rights is more crucial than ever, it is disheartening to witness the collapse of constitutional remedies. The Constitution's plan for independent courts was meant to safeguard our inalienable rights, but regrettably, it has failed us. Aziz Huq's thought-provoking book, "The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies," unravels the complexities of this issue, exposing how our courts have become barriers to progressive regulation while shielding state violence.
One alarming example is the recent Supreme Court ruling that continues to grant police officers protection under the doctrine of "qualified immunity," even when they shoot or brutalize innocent civilians. This judicial invention, along with others, obstructs the vindication of our rights and perpetuates injustice. Contrary to their intended purpose as protectors of individual rights, our courts have betrayed us in favor of limiting accountability.
It is important to recognize that these seemingly abstract doctrines, like "qualified immunity," have tangible and detrimental real-world consequences. Imagine a scenario where a person's Fourth Amendment rights are violated by a highway patrol officer, resulting in traumatic brain damage. Or picture a courageous individual being fired from their job for testifying in a legal proceeding, only to be met with mocking laughter when seeking justice. These are not hypothetical situations; these are real injustices faced by countless individuals who find themselves without adequate remedies.
For far too long, federal courts have proven themselves to be unreliable guardians of individual rights. While they once positioned themselves as the ultimate protectors against the state's infringement, they have since abandoned this role and, in some cases, actively rejected it. This collapse of the constitutional remedies system is a stark reminder of the vision our Founding Fathers had when establishing federal courts. Huq's impactful account reveals how the expansion of immunity principles has created a vast divide between our rights and the ability to challenge crimes committed by the state.
If we want to reclaim our rights and overcome the hurdles that impede justice, we must understand the depth of this issue. "The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies" is an essential read for anyone who seeks to reshape our understanding of the challenges we face. Let us come together and take action to ensure a fair and just society. Click here to get your copy now.
Discover More Best Sellers in Law
Shop Law
$16.94


Originalism's Promise: A Natural Law Account of the American Constitution
$38.99


Legislation and Regulation, Cases and Materials (University Casebook Series)
$270.00


Introduction to French Law (Introduction to International Law)
$134.00


Smoke and Mirrors: The Politics and Culture of Air Pollution
$30.00


Priceless: The Case that Brought Down the Visa/MasterCard Bank Cartel
$26.26
