Description
Book Synopsis: The updated paperback edition of HATE dispels misunderstandings plaguing our perennial debates about "hate speech vs. free speech," showing that the First Amendment approach promotes free speech and democracy, equality, and societal harmony. As "hate speech" has no generally accepted definition, we hear many incorrect assumptions that it is either absolutely unprotected or absolutely protected from censorship. Rather, U.S. law allows government to punish hateful or discriminatory speech in specific contexts when it directly causes imminent serious harm. Yet, government may not punish such speech solely because its message is disfavored, disturbing, or vaguely feared to possibly contribute to some future harm. "Hate speech" censorship proponents stress the potential harms such speech might further: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from many countries, this book shows that "hate speech" are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Therefore, prominent social justice advocates worldwide maintain that the best way to resist hate and promote equality is not censorship, but rather, vigorous "counterspeech" and activism.
Details
Title: HATE: Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship
In the era of ever-increasing misunderstandings and heated debates, it's crucial to have a clear understanding of the delicate balance between "hate speech" and free speech. The updated paperback edition of HATE demolishes the misconceptions overshadowing this debate, unveiling the real essence of the First Amendment - a powerful force that not only safeguards our freedom of expression but also fosters democracy, equality, and societal harmony.
Let's face it, "hate speech" is an elusive term, with no universally accepted definition. Countless false assumptions have clouded our judgment regarding its protection from censorship. However, HATE sheds light on the truth, revealing that while the U.S. law permits the government to address hateful and discriminatory speech when it directly causes imminent harm, it cannot simply punish speech just because it is unsettling or falls out of favor.
Those who advocate for "hate speech" censorship often highlight the potential harms it may aggravate: discrimination, violence, and psychological injuries. But here's the catch – the effectiveness of censorship in countering these feared injuries is highly questionable. Drawing upon evidence from diverse countries, HATE conclusively establishes that attempts to curtail "hate speech" are not only ineffective but can also be counterproductive.
So, what's the solution? Prominent social justice advocates worldwide agree that countering hate and promoting equality should be achieved through a different approach - vigorous "counterspeech" and activism. HATE urges readers to embrace free speech as a tool for resistance. By engaging in open dialogue, voicing our opinions, and standing against hate together, we can truly make strides towards a more inclusive and harmonious society. Embrace the power of free speech today.
Discover More Best Sellers in Constitutional Law
Shop Constitutional Law
Blackstone's EU Treaties & Legislation (Blackstone's Statute Series)
$20.00


Law 101: Everything You Need to Know About American Law, Fifth Edition
$26.99


Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (Aspen Treatise)
$93.13


Don't Forget Us Here: Lost and Found at Guantanamo
$15.99


Perfecting the Union: National and State Authority in the US Constitution
$28.45


Betrayal: The Failure of American Jewish Leadership
$17.99


Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine
$14.99
